Project members Emma and Ivan are together with Jonathan Rokem organising a panel on urban violence in troubled cities, to take place in London in August. See more information below!
Urban Violence in Troubled Cities – Towards Comparative Geographies of Hope
Comparative re-examinations of how we understand urban violence and how it affects as well as is affected by space are becoming increasingly critical. Violence in all its degrees and nuances is a growing political and humanitarian concern that is becoming increasingly urban. As a result of these shifts in global and local geopolitical forces, the geographies of cities are being restructured, frequently in unpredictable ways, their populations coming together or becoming polarised with often un-ordinary and underexplored spatial patterns. At the same time, the relational trajectories of violence and securitisation are affected by the geographies in which they take place. Following recent calls for scholarship dedicated to understanding violence from a spatial perspective (Gregory & Pred, 2007; Springer & Le Billon, 2016), this CfP invites interdisciplinary insights from political geography, urban studies, criminology, peace and conflict studies, and political science, among other disciplines, in order to address the differential role which geography plays in the emergence of urban violence pointing to a broader understanding of urban violence and its spatial significance.
Considering the global increase in violent events in several of the world’s major cities (Urdal & Hoelscher 2012), comparative spatial analysis of the expanding world of contested cities can give hope to a more diverse geographical understanding of the dynamics of urban violence and its effect on and interplay with the everyday lives of people. This CfP’s main aim is to shed further light on how comparing urban exclusion, inequality, tension, mobility, connectivity and its relationship to violence can influence local residents in troubled and more hopeful urban environments.
The session’s main objective is to bring together a selected group of international case studies engaging with spatial analysis and urban violence driven by geopolitical regional . In doing so, we seek to start learning from and comparing across different cities – pointing to the growing need to re-think ‘labels’ and ‘concepts’ attributed to cities and neighborhoods, to better conceptualise and adapt policy and practice to (e.g. ethnic, religious, or LGBTQ) minorities and exposed citizens and non-citizens (e.g. migrants, women, unemployed or homeless persons) in an ever more fractured urban geopolitical reality (Rokem and Boano 2018). We are particularly looking for papers that share a joint critical and comparative reading of urban geopolitical violence and spatial analysis in cities from different regional settings.
We invite papers that discuss and address (although not limited to) the following broad topics:
- How do mobility, proximity, and connectivity shape the opportunities available to engage in violent conflict?
- Comparing how (historical and contemporary) spatial policies, urban conflicts and divisions impact violence in cities.
- Comparing planning under violent urban geopolitical conditions and its (lack of) promotion of spatial and social justice.
- Learning from spatial analysis of urban violence across ‘Northern’ and ‘Southern’ cities.
Jonathan Rokem Rock, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Emma Elfversson, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University (email@example.com)
Ivan Gusic, Department of Political Science, Lund University and The Swedish Institute of International Affairs (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Interested session participants should contact Jonathan Rokem Rock (email@example.com) by 5th February 2019 to indicate their interest in participating in the session. Please include your affiliation, a proposed title and a 250-300 word abstract.
Successful applicants will be expected to register and pay the RGS_IBG 2019 Conference registration fee.
Dates: 28 – 30 August 2019
Conference website: https://www.rgs.org/research/annual-international-conference/programme-(1)/
Gregory, D., & Pred, A. (Eds.). (2007). Violent Geographies: Fear, Terror, and Political Violence. New York: Routledge.
Rokem J. & Boano C. (2018) Urban Geopolitics: Rethinking Planning in Contested Cities, Routledge, London and New York.
Springer, S., & Le Billon, P. (2016). Violence and space: An introduction to the geographies of violence. Political Geography, 52, 1–3.
Urdal, H. & Hoelscher, K. (2012). ‘Explaining urban social disorder and violence: An empirical study of event data from Asian and Sub-Saharan African cities’, International Interactions 38(4): 512–528.